An area for non-techie's to look, and comment on, stuff in progress/betas would be a good idea I think.
It will also keeps the noise down (unwanted chat, comments) for those who are engaged in the serious development? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Butterworth Sent: 05 October 2006 18:38 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: RE: [backstage] New backstage.bbc.co.uk website Perhaps there should be a 'tech' and 'no-tech' version of the site. The 'tech' version could contain all the raw feeds, blogs, documentation, and alpha version of the software The 'nontech' version could contain working betas and somewhere for non-technical people to feedback on them, and also a 'suggestions box' for non-technical people to put forward their wants. Brian Butterworth www.ukfree.tv -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard P Edwards Sent: 05 October 2006 18:09 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: Re: [backstage] New backstage.bbc.co.uk website I have been hereabouts for years and today was my third time at the web-site, perhaps not common, but what is.... It is interesting that the blog has no comments on it....... yet here in the mails a variety of brilliant subjects have been discussed. I am therefore intrigued by the relationship between the two. Perhaps there could be a sidestage blog, where concepts can be discussed, without the certainty of framework....... but for the community ...... for example the duc, digidesign users conference over at their site, or any active forum. My apologies if this is available to the community elsewhere, if it is I'd love the link. There are a very wide variety of people in this community, past and present, I for one would like to see more on how backstage can actually change the course of various experiences within the BBC, but not necessarily involving the critic of what is already there. Thanks. RichE On 4 Oct 2006, at 17:53, Jose-Carlos Mariategui wrote: > In deed, as stated before, I think it should be accessible to common > people that do not have any programming skills and that may be able to > mashup the feeds using some type of GUI. A sort of ning.com for > dummies. > > > > on 10/4/06 2:05 PM, Lee Goddard at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> How would you like >>> to consume the site... Mobile / www / offline downloads? >> >> WWW, RSS, thanks for asking! >> >> >> - >> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, >> please visit >> http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. >> Unofficial list archive: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/ > > > - > Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, > please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/ > mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail- > archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/ - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.12/462 - Release Date: 03/10/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.12/462 - Release Date: 03/10/2006 - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/ - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
