On 16/08/07, Jason Cartwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does iPlayer contain Silverlight? I've not seen anything to suggest it
> does.
>
> What the hell does all this matter anyhow, there is no lock in. The tech
> is
> just being used to deliver the content as per spec, which it seems to be
> doing. Nothing is stopping the BBC ditching MS products for iPlayer at any
> time with a simple (automatically installed?) patch, right?
>
> Seems the anti-DRM protests are misdirected. Why is the yellow jump-suit
> brigade talking to the people who actually have the power to change it?
> The
> rights holders. We've seen rights-cleared videos being released without
> DRM
> on bbc.co.uk for years. I don't see anyone hassling Apple - but plenty of
> people are hassling record labels, and they have gone on to do something
> about it.


Good point. They should talk to http://www.pact.co.uk/ but I guess it's the
old "everyone has to pay the licence fee" issue and all the touchy-freely
stuff from the BBC management and BBC Trust (in the vein of "it's your BBC")
which confuses people.  There is clearly a problem now as the Trust supports
the management, not the licence-fee payers!

I guess people read things like this
http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2006/09_september/28/microsoft.shtml
and
put 10 and 10 together and get 101 (binary joke!).




iPlayer installation numbers will be tiny compared to Flash installations -
> you know YouTube gets many, many more visitors that bbc.co.uk?



That will be the fact that less than 1% of the planet's population lives in
the UK?


J
>
>
> On 15/8/07 20:15, "Dave Crossland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 14/08/07, Jason Cartwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The irony is that it probably doesn't matter now. They could now
> download it
> >> using their Windows XP machine in DRMed Windows Media Format.
> >>
> >> All thanks to our new overlord Bill, and his maniacal scheme to take
> over
> >> the BBC from the inside.
> >
> > Adobe currently has web video locked down; Apple, Real, Java, Xiph,
> > and of course Microsoft are all in very niche use compared to Adobe
> > Flash. Adobe Apollo is a direct competitor to Microsoft Silverlight,
> > and with the inertia of Flash video and a large group of web designers
> > already familiar with Flash, plus cheaper a licensing model than
> > Microsoft, it looks like its in with a chance. The typical Microsoft
> > response to fair competition is to compete unfairly.
> >
> > iPlayer, and a number of other high profile 2007 BBC projects, are
> > based on Silverlight technology. Highfield's reponse on the Backstage
> > blog points at the other proprietary technologies the BBC foists on
> > the public, but these are based on previous technology decisions; the
> > new stuff is all Silverlight based.
> >
> > 100,000 iPlayer sign-ups in a week, Martin? That's 100,000 more
> > Silverlight installations. Given Microsoft's other major play to
> > deploy Silverlight is Vista, and we all know how well that's working
> > out for them this year, its outrageous to me that the BBC has paid
> > Microsoft _anything_ for forcing license fee payers to install this
> > key piece of strategic technology for them. Then UK is, afterall, one
> > of the most broadband-saturated and media-consuming audiences, leading
> > the way for other nations - Is the BBC likely to open up a
> > non-zero-price iPlayer to international viewers at somepoint? So this
> > is a big win for Microsoft's bid to control the next stage of web
> > development with Silverlight.
> >
> > The BBC is committed to shipping a cross-platform iPlayer, and its a
> > shame that this becomes the sole focus of the reporting on this issue.
> > An iPlayer for 3 or 4 platforms is 3 or 4 times as worse as an XP-only
> > iPlayer, because it is imposing DRM on even more people, and implying
> > that DRM is acceptable.
> >
> > When it does ship a cross-platform iPlayer, I expect it will be based
> > on Novell's Mono Moonlight for GNU/Linux, probably doing the media
> > codec stuff with the GStreamer framework given that Fluendo, its
> > sponsor, sells Windows Media Codecs already -
> > https://shop.fluendo.com/product_info.php?products_id=45 - and the Mac
> > OS X one might be Mono or Microsoft based.
> >
> > That's going to really help the widespread adoption of Silverlight as
> > the Rich Internet Application platform of choice.
> >
> > In 2007, Google has maintained the dominant position for monetising
> > search and advertising - of the text web. Their purchase of YouTube
> > suggested they were serious about monetising the emerging video web,
> > but the DRM aspects of Silverlight video delivery mean that their
> > ability to provide search and advertising for web video is going to be
> > undermined.
> >
> > So the BBC hasn't just helped Microsoft pull a Adobe-killer, it's also
> > helping Microsoft pull a Google-killer.
>
> -
> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
> visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
> Unofficial
> list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
>



-- 
Please email me back if you need any more help.

Brian Butterworth
www.ukfree.tv

Reply via email to