Thanks - I hadn't noticed they'd "released" it. If you read the licensing agreement first ( http://www.adobe.com/devnet/rtmp/pdf/rtmp_specification_license_1.0.pdf ) then you'll probably not want to go and download the specs.
There are plenty of reasons why you'd not want to download and use this adobe spec as it allegedly makes you party to their *very* restrictive license/terms of use of their patented and proprietary protocol. I thought it sounded too good to be true - i.e. unencumbered openness! I suggest reading the other reverse engineered RTMP specs out there in the net if you are interested in implementing any rtmp client or server. Will they be less trigger happy - I guess not - now they'll just claim that you broke their licensing agreement by implementing their specs even if you never read them! ~Phil On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 12:05 +0100, Alan Pope wrote: > 2009/6/18 Steve Carpenter <steven.carpen...@warwick.ac.uk>: > > They released the specs earlier this week. :) > > > > http://www.adobe.com/devnet/rtmp/ > > > > Is this going to make the Adobe hounds less DMCA trigger happy against > tools such as rtmpdump ? > > Cheers, > Al. - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
