2009/12/2 Ian Forrester <ian.forres...@bbc.co.uk>: > > > seeing isn't wave at all. Its simply a rough cut > implementation of what's possible with the wave protocol.
Right; the protocol seems sound enough, and I expect that (like Novell) it will get picked up by projects that would have had to have done the engineering on such a protocol themselves. But there are relatively few of those projects, and so I don't expect it will be soon that we see anything 'wow'-worth out of Wave. I think it will get subsumed by projects that use it and we will know those by their own names and indeed may come to know Wave itself by those names; like people who use the web and that the web _is_ the internet... > wondered if Google had put out wave too early for consumers? As Scot said, its hardly had a consumer release. Anyone who is involved in projects that might make use of such technology have heard about it, understand it, and probably by now have a beta account. What's the fuss? :-) - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
