|
Most NFS servers are pitifully slow compared to a local filesystem,
particularly when dealing with many small files. It pains me to think
about how slow that might get-- is anyone else using a non-local
filesystem? brien Simon Köstlin wrote: I think TCP is a safer connection or plays that none rolls? Also when I click on a PC in the web interface it takes around 20-30 seconds until the web page appears with the backups which were made. I thought that would be better with an other connection. But that time is not dependent on the size of the backups. I made backups with just some files and it takes that time to load also if I have Backups with 3GB.-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Les Mikesell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Januar 2007 20:35 An: Simon Köstlin Cc: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC Data Directory on a Network Attached Storage Simon Köstlin wrote: |
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
