I don't know if the backup server is configured with mod_perl. I installed BackupPC with a package under Kubuntu. I think it won't be configured with mod_perl then.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Jason Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Januar 2007 21:05 An: Simon Köstlin Cc: 'Les Mikesell'; backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC Data Directory on a Network Attached Storage Simon Köstlin wrote: > I think TCP is a safer connection or plays that none rolls? > Also when I click on a PC in the web interface it takes around 20-30 seconds > until the web page appears with the backups which were made. I thought that > would be better with an other connection. But that time is not dependent on > the size of the backups. I made backups with just some files and it takes > that time to load also if I have Backups with 3GB. > Actually, UDP is a faster transport protocol than TCP, since TCP is built on top of UDP, more or less. I'm not certain TCP would be safer, except in the event you have a firewall between your backup server and the NAS, and you planned to implement a secure layer for it to talk over. If you are seeing performance problems, perhaps it is slow because you are using the CGI interface through Apache, rather than installing it with mod_perl. Did you configure the backup server to use mod_perl? JH ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
