Ludovic writes: > Good news: I've uploaded backuppc 3.0.0 to debian unstable yesterday. > > Your feedback is welcome !
Thanks for doing this. Your previous 2.x debian package has been very popular. I do have a question: for your 2.x package you hardcoded the config paths. In 3.x the FHS mode places the config files in places similar to your 2.x package - but not exactly the same. That's why people that started with your 2.x debian package and then upgraded using the vanilla tarball are having problems. What paths did you use for the 3.x package, and will it do the right thing when a user upgrades from the debian 2.x to the debian 3.x package? Craig ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
