On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Jacob wrote: > If this is really the way backuppc does incremental backups, I think > backuppc should be a bit more incremental with its incremental backups. > Instead of comparing against the last full, it should compare against the > last full and incremental backups. This would solve this problem and make > backuppc more efficient anyway, AFAIK.
That proposal goes completely against the basic principles of incremental backups! If you want something like that, you should use multiple levels of incremental backups. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
