KLEIN Stéphane wrote: > Le Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:20:29 -0700, dan a écrit : > >> i guess that main problem is that rsync is going to use what it needs, >> no more no less. If you limit rsync's memory it wont just use less >> memory, it will throw a fit. If rsync runs out of ram it will crash. >> Also, I think that if you use a memory limitor like ulimit or vlimit >> then rsync cant use any swap so you really will get a crash. > > So, the better solution can be use another transport method like "tar" > over ssh ?
You are just trading resource usage here. If you have plenty of bandwidth tar will work with less memory consumption. A side effect of using tar is that you'll miss old files in their new locations under a renamed directory in incremental runs, though. -- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/