Hi On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 01:30:25 -0400, "Jeffrey J. Kosowsky" <backu...@kosowsky.org> wrote: > > well, under normal conditions (ie: unix), i would say rsyncd is > > faster, as doesnt have the ssh overhead... > But if bandwidth is your limitation (which it frequently is on any > decent system) then rsync+ssh may be faster if there is a lot of fresh > data to be transferred due to the compression of ssh transfers.
bandwidth is the limit if you can both encrypt and compress faster than the network bandwidth... also, the bonus of the compression depends of the data and can also be gained by the normal rsync-rsyncd... backuppc rsync cant because doesnt support compression, so the main question might be how much the data compress Cya higuita -- Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country. -- Hermann Goering, Nazi and war criminal, 1883-1946
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/