29.02.2020 1:13, Matthew Pounsett пишет:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 10:54, Alexander Moisseev <mois...@mezonplus.ru <mailto:mois...@mezonplus.ru>> wrote: > > It's different, but still way off. Reporting 269G when actual usage is over a terabyte. But if it's not updating very often that makes a bit more sense. The fact that the graph resolution is hourly is I think part of what makes this confusing. It's just routinely updated with out-of-date information? Why do you think the resolution is hourly? It is daily. The RRD step is exactly 86400 seconds.
The data may be updated daily, but the resolution of the 4-week graph is hourly; the graph is updated hourly,
No. Pictures are generated on page loading.
and each horizontal pixel of the area graph is an hour of time.
No. 4 weeks are 672 hours, but the width of the graph is 600 pixels.
If it were daily I'd only have a one or two pixel wide graph, instead of what I have.
Your assumption that pixel resolution always match data resolution is wrong.
The lower (52 week) graph has a resolution of one day.
Actually, both graphs have the same data resolution of one day and both of them have different pixel resolution. I am not trying to convince you if it is good or bad, just explaining what you see on the graphs. _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
