Ralf Gross schrieb: > > The transferrate depends on the type of backup and if spooling was > > used. > > Update: > > With dd and different block sizes I get 100-115 MB/s (bs=64k to > 256k). This was only a simple test with the new LTO-4 drive. Changing > the bs to more than 128 didn't result in better performance. > > A simple test with tar was much slower (~60 MB/s, didn't touch the > bs). > > I didn't test bacula with other bs than the default, but I get ~77 > MB/s for a backup of a file on the sd (fd/sd on the same server) where > the LTO-4 drive is connected to (Attribute Spooling enabled, just one > 20 GB file). > > I'm not sure why backup to LTO-4 isn't faster than the backup to > LTO-4, but the result is not that bad.
This should be: I'm not sure why backup to LTO-4 isn't faster than backup to LTO-3... Ralf ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
