Dirk Bartley wrote: > Greetings > > Can someone tell me if there is a different behaviour in the latest > version? A job started on Friday for a monthly pool. I use a single > tape drive with no changer. The tape that was asked for was in a safe > in a different building. Other tapes for the monthly pool were > available and appendable. My recollection was that previously I could > put a tape in the appropriate pool in the drive, and as long as it was > appendable in the media list, the job would proceed with that tape. > > Bacula kept insisting that I use the tape it wanted from that pool, not > the tape from that pool I had inserted. I had to put in a tape I had > for the Monthly pool that was appendable, emtpy and then mark it as > recyle=yes to get the job started. > > Is this something different??
I do not know the answer to your question. After inserting the tape, did you issue a mount command? -- Dan Langille BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference : http://www.bsdcan.org/ PGCon - The PostgreSQL Conference: http://www.pgcon.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
