On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 09:35 +0100, Eric Bollengier wrote: > Hello Dirk, > > Le Monday 02 March 2009 15:09:07 Dirk Bartley, vous avez écrit : > > Greetings > > > > Can someone tell me if there is a different behaviour in the latest > > version? > > Can you give me your previous installation date or bacula/svn revision > numbers ?
Current 8498 Was on director 6975 Dirk > > Bye > > > A job started on Friday for a monthly pool. I use a single > > tape drive with no changer. The tape that was asked for was in a safe > > in a different building. Other tapes for the monthly pool were > > available and appendable. My recollection was that previously I could > > put a tape in the appropriate pool in the drive, and as long as it was > > appendable in the media list, the job would proceed with that tape. > > > > Bacula kept insisting that I use the tape it wanted from that pool, not > > the tape from that pool I had inserted. I had to put in a tape I had > > for the Monthly pool that was appendable, emtpy and then mark it as > > recyle=yes to get the job started. > > > > Is this something different?? > > > > Dirk > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
