> On 18.09.2005 07:12, Joe Rhett wrote:
> >Before I go to all of that trouble, could someone kindly look at the
> >configuration I posted and tell me what is missing? I'm fairly certain
> >that it is a configuration problem. I doubt that so many people using it
> >wouldn't have found this problem before. Could someone please review the
> >configuration for sanity?
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 11:32:43AM +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Why don't you simple comment out the "Label Format" directive, and see
> if that corrects the behaviour. If it does, file a bug report telling
> that the manual needs an update or the DIR behaviour should be changed.
You mean this line?
LabelFormat = "liz"
This cannot be relevent to why bacula would continue making tapes named
"liztape001". The LabelFormat was "liztape" roughly a year ago, back when
I was trying to persuade Kern to make bacula auto-label unlabelled tapes.
It hasn't been liztape for quite some time now.
And again, why would "LabelFormat" or "LabelMedia" create new media that
doesn't exist? Auto-labelling new tapes is one thing, creating "wishful
thinking" media entries is absurd.
> That's basically what I suggested in may last post(s), and I think you
> should try that first before you complain again and again.
Because the problem is clearly much bigger than a bug in a single directive.
--
Joe Rhett
senior geek
meer.net
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very
own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
