On Monday 28 November 2005 09:33, Ludovic Strappazon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just tried the "Scratch Pool" feature. I'm very happy to have it in
> Bacula.
> However, I think there is two problems, unless I'm missing something :
>
> - Bacula takes a Scratch Pool volume when it can't find any appendable
> volume, but it should (in my opinion) look before if there's any
> recyclable volume. I think it should use Scratch Pool only when a pool
> can't cycle on its volumes.
I didn't really think too much about when Bacula should use a Scratch Volume,
so I could imagine some change in the code. However, I don't quite
understand what you are saying above -- your sentences seem to contradict
themselves. Could you say it a different way? Sorry ...
>
> - The retention of the volume added from the Scratch Pool should be the
> retention of its new pool instead of one year.
Yes, this is a good idea. The Volume should take on the retention period of
the new pool. Noted ...
--
Best regards,
Kern
(">
/\
V_V
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
