Hello,

On 3/10/2006 4:03 PM, Erich Prinz wrote:
I've noticed the date/time stamp reporting wrong too, though in restoring the files, it never poses any problems.

The other thing to note about volumes (and for us control freak types, this is a bit awkward) per the Bacula documentation it's best to let Bacula decide what volumes to use. Just label the media so it's easy to identify.

:-)

Just what I think... except for the paranthesis, but then I never encountered cases where tapes were used out of the expected order.

In using other systems, I've always tied the media name to a specific day of the week - it works - especially with clients who don't need to become sys admins to figure the thing out.

Well, that depends on the setup of course - I simply try to avoid a media-to-weekday mapping.

Arno

Hope that helps,

Erich

On Mar 10, 2006, at 2:58 AM, Ralf Gross wrote:

Hi,

I use a pool with 6 tapes for weekly full backup, each full backup needs 3 tapes. Retention worked fine for the last few weeks, the expected volumes were used (volume retention 9 days, week 1 volume Bang1/2/3, week 2 volume
Bang3/4/5...). Today I got the notification about the upcoming jobs  this
weekend:

Full   11-Mär-06  19:00  Bang            Bang5-2006-02-08

Full   11-Mär-06  19:50  BackupCatalog   Bang5-2006-02-08

I was suprised that volume Bang5 should be used as first tape. I  changed
the state of the other volumes (4/6) with bconsole to Recycle, but bacula
still wants volume Bang5 as first tape. This is the output from 'list
volumes' (removed some fields to better fit the page).

+----------------+---------+--------------+-----+---- +-------------------+ |volumename |volstatus|volbytes |files|recy| lastwritten | +----------------+---------+--------------+-----+---- +-------------------+ |Bang1-2006-02-08|Full |66,393,748,936| 67 | 1 |2006-02-25 22:48:14| |Bang2-2006-02-08|Purged |66,509,741,779| 67 | 1 |2006-02-26 01:47:09| |Bang3-2006-02-08|Purged |60,504,889,661| 62 | 1 |2006-02-26 11:05:01| |Bang4-2006-02-08|Recycle |66,846,623,315| 67 | 1 |2006-02-18 22:47:03| |Bang5-2006-02-08|Recycle | 1| 0 | 1 |2006-02-19 01:41:36| |Bang6-2006-02-08|Recycle |66,418,086,144| 68 | 1 |2006-02-19 11:13:43| +----------------+---------+--------------+-----+---- +-------------------+

I'm confused by this output, because Bang5 was the second tape of  three
tapes that were used for the full backup three weeks ago. I don't know why
volbytes/files show these values.

Looking at the volume state with llist, reports 1970-01-01 01:00:00 as
firstwritten date.

          mediaid: 5
       volumename: Bang5-2006-02-08
             slot: 5
           poolid: 1
        mediatype: AIT-2
     firstwritten: 1970-01-01 01:00:00
      lastwritten: 2006-02-19 01:41:36
        labeldate: 2006-02-18 19:30:03
          voljobs: 0
         volfiles: 0
        volblocks: 0
        volmounts: 1
         volbytes: 1
        volerrors: 0
        volwrites: 1,031,691
 volcapacitybytes: 0
        volstatus: Recycle
          recycle: 1
     volretention: 777,600
   voluseduration: 172,800
       maxvoljobs: 0
      maxvolfiles: 0
      maxvolbytes: 0
        inchanger: 1
          endfile: 66
         endblock: 8,689
         volparts: 0
        labeltype: 0
        storageid: 2

There is one other tape used for a second client that reports this  date
too. I checked the syslog entries, but couldn't find anything obvious. The
time entries between 2006-02-18 and 2006-02-19 are all ok.

Any ideas why bacula reports this wrong date?

Ralf




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


--
IT-Service Lehmann                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arno Lehmann                  http://www.its-lehmann.de



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to