On 5 Oct 2006 at 15:36, James Ray wrote: > Dan Langille wrote: > > On 5 Oct 2006 at 9:11, Bill Moran wrote: > > > >> I haven't had time to investigate whether the [FD|SD|DIR]Address sets > >> both the listening and the outgoing address, but a firewall audit is > >> on the TODO list, and when I finally get to it, I'll have to address > >> this for a number of services, not only Bacula. > > > > My testing today shows that is sets both listening and outgoing. All > > I tested was a status command. Nothing more. > > > > > > Well, that doesn't seem to be the case on my linux (FC5) machine. :( > > The LISTEN addresses are right but the address the communications spawn > from is the base system address. > > tcp 0 0 xxx.xxx.x.49:9101 0.0.0.0:* > LISTEN 100 9291 3056/bacula-dir > tcp 0 0 xxx.xxx.x.49:9103 0.0.0.0:* > LISTEN 0 9239 3011/bacula-sd > > Then run a status client command with the following ngrep running (I > shouldn't see any data) > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] bacula]# ngrep "" "src host xxx.xxx.x.48 and dst host > xxx.xxx.x.3" > interface: eth0 (xxx.xxx.x.0/255.255.254.0) > filter: (ip) and ( src host xxx.xxx.x.48 and dst host xxx.xxx.x.3 ) > 114 received, 0 dropped > > And I see the following in netstat: > > tcp 0 0 xxx.xxx.x.48:53286 xxx.xxx.x.3:9102 > TIME_WAIT 0 0 - > > :(
Without the corrresponding configuration file, I cannot comment. -- Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
