On Tuesday 07 November 2006 21:59, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > On 11/7/2006 1:31 PM, Silver Salonen wrote: > > On Tuesday 07 November 2006 14:28, Dan Langille wrote: > > > >>On 7 Nov 2006 at 14:17, Silver Salonen wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Hi. > >>> > >>>I'm a little concerned here about the fact that it's not possible to > > > > reload > > > >>>bacula-sd's and bacula-fd's configuration without restarting them. > > Not something I found a problem.
Yes, but don't you see the potential of this becoming a problem some day? :) Such reloading by sending HUP is implemented in most server-apps.. why not in Bacula? > >>>I've had situations where adding new clients has to wait until current > > backups > >>>are finished transferring data to bacula-sd (it may take several days as > >>>backup-server may be located in WAN), so the problem could be almost as > >>>critical as doing backups is. > >>>I could avoid this waiting if I used only one device for all the backups, > > but > >>>currently this is not possible/considerable because devices cannot have > > more than 1 concurrent job. > >>> > >>>Will these limits persist in Bacula 1.40 also? > >> > >>AFAIK, yes. I have not heard of any work being done in this area. > > Funny. I guess I don't understand the question. > > You can set up the SD devices to allow multiple concurrent jobs. > For tape storage, the number of drives is "fixed enough" in the sense > that adding more drives doesn't happen often enough to need a dynamic SD > reconfiguration IMO, so I suppose you're talking about disk file based > volumes. Yes I'm using disk based volumes everywhere. How can you set up SD devices that allow multiple concurrent jobs? I've tried it unsuccessfully in several ways, but.. I guess I miss something simple there.. We've written about this in another thread though ;) > With specific requirements I can think about the need for a storage > device per client, but I wouldn't want such a configuration monster :-) > so I prefer to find a solution where I get what I want with a > fine-grained pool setup, and only one or, possibly, a very limited > number of storage devices. > > > > Doesn't anyone besides me miss this? > > Not me, at least. > > >Should I submit feature requests for > > reloading components' configuration > > Go ahead - let the voters decide ;-) > > > and for adding parameter "maximum concurrent jobs" for devices? > > That's implemented now, and has been around as long as I know Bacula. IIRC. > > Arno Where? Device resource doesn't support this - when I set "Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 10" in Device resource, "/etc/init.d/bacula start" tells me: * Starting bacula storage daemon ... 09-Nov 16:52 bacula-sd: ERROR TERMINATION at parse_conf.c:834 Config error: Keyword "MaximumConcurrentJobs" not permitted in this resource. Perhaps you left the trailing brace off of the previous resource. : line 69, col 25 of file /etc/bacula/bacula-sd.conf Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 10 Silver ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users