Dear All
I have adopted job migration and all seems to work well with clients that
were already in the Catalog when the backup was direct to tape (after
spooling).
I have an old client that had not been backed up for 6 weeks and so had no
Full backup in the catalog. The incremental Job on the Client was
converted to a Full backup but this is occurring every day. It did not
happen with direct backup to tape. Other old clients are working correctly
and I have not had to add a new client to the system.
Now using Job migration it seems the Volume retention period of the
migration pool is assigned to the Volume and not the Volume retention
period of the the Next Pool.
Here are the Pools
Pool {
Name = Migrate-Full
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = yes
AutoPrune = yes
Next Pool = Full
Storage = File
Maximum Volume Jobs = 100
Volume Retention = 1 days
Maximum Volumes = 40
LabelFormat = Full
}
Pool {
Name = Full
Storage = Autochanger
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = yes
AutoPrune = yes
Volume Retention = 35 days
}
The Migrate-Full pool Volume retention period is small so to conserve disc
space.
When a client is migrated does it inherit the Volume Retention perion of
the Next Pool?
Thanks
Stephen Carr
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
