On 2007.08.08. 16:59, Kern Sibbald wrote: ... >>> You can see an overview of the features at: >>> >>> http://www.bacula.org/dev-manual/GUI_Programs.html >> Is bat going to be considered stable for this release? I am sorry if I >> missed that. > > I consider it stable, but given that it is a *very* large body of brand new > code, we can expect a number of bugs to crop up when it becomes heavily used > under varying conditions. I don't expect any of the bugs to be a show > stopper. I have used it exclusively for at least four months now.
if there was a restrictd console that would only allow any access only to few hosts, would bat sensibly allow accessing director and, for example, restoring data ? or would it freak out because of being unable to access some information ? if that was possible, it would make some admins pretty happy as they could restore their server data with a clickthrough tool themselves :) >> John -- Rich ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
