Before to begin the project, I have seen already available. I.e. installed and tried to work.
I do not want to write critical remarks here . I shall note, that in webacula I at once have written those functions which I use daily. I do not know, whether it is necessary to load further webacula seldom used opportunities, or to be limited to a reasonable minimum. bweb it is written on perl. And constantly reminds me that I used in work firefox. But my working browser is konqueror., etc. Personally it seems to me, that perl the web-development is unpromising for the future. Probably, I am mistaken. > Ryan Novosielski wrote: > What I would personally like is to see is some collaboration between the > bweb and webacula folks, maybe coming up with one product. I certainly > don't want to run both (having many admin interfaces is getting out of > hand) and bweb is farther along. Any chance of something like that happening? -- have a nice day ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
