Hi there,
Firstly, thank you for getting back to me, and with such speed.
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> MaximumPartSize = 5000M;
>
> That directive takes no effect, it's only used for DVD writing.
Ah!
>
> The above looks good, provided the retention times and set volume
> sizes fit, i.e. you have enough volumes available to hold the data of
> a complete cycle of backups.
>
> In the case of the Inc-Pool, for example, you only allow 30 GB of data
> to be stored. Purge oldest volume is dangerous in that it could delete
> incrementals from between the last differential or full backup, and
> the currently running job, which would make your backups more or less
> worthless. You should be absolutely sure the 20 GB remaining after a
> volume is purged are sufficient. See the last two paragraphs in the
> manual description of this option...
Ah that is a very good point, thank you for pointing that out, I'll
modify that to prevent it causing a purge on valid data.
> Does the output of the 'show pool=Inc-Pool' bconsole command
> correspond to what you set up? Of course, similar for the other pools.
It appears to, I'm going to start making modification so will have to
force it to re-read these settings.
> What is the state of your volumes? If you think a certain volume
> should be recycled, you can check its settings with 'llist
> volume=<name>' in bconsole.
Perhaps in trying to fix things I have caused a problem, as an example
of one of the volumes:
*llist volume=Full-0002
MediaId: 3
VolumeName: Full-0002
Slot: 0
PoolId: 1
MediaType: File
FirstWritten: 2007-09-11 02:46:45
LastWritten: 2007-09-11 06:07:39
LabelDate: 2007-09-11 02:46:45
VolJobs: 3
VolFiles: 3
VolBlocks: 266,306
VolMounts: 3
VolBytes: 17,179,866,421
VolErrors: 0
VolWrites: 266,307
VolCapacityBytes: 0
VolStatus: Purged
Enabled: 1
Recycle: 1
VolRetention: 2,592,000
VolUseDuration: 0
MaxVolJobs: 0
MaxVolFiles: 0
MaxVolBytes: 17,179,869,184
InChanger: 0
EndFile: 3
EndBlock: 4,294,964,532
VolParts: 0
LabelType: 0
StorageId: 1
DeviceId: 0
LocationId: 0
RecycleCount: 0
InitialWrite: 0000-00-00 00:00:00
ScratchPoolId: 0
RecyclePoolId: 0
Comment: NULL
Which shows the volume as purged but yet its still consuming disk space,
is this normal? Is there a way of telling it to null/zero the file?
> In my opinion, with "Purge Oldest Volume" you're sure to shoot
> yourself in the foot one day. Relying on regular retention is much
> more useful in most cases - if nothing more, it forces you to balance
> the retention times, backup frequency, and available space to really
> fit your needs.
Thanks for your input, I clearly have misunderstood how the whole
storage system/disk allocation is used with Bacula. Back to starting
again I feel and re-reading manuals!
--
Andy
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
