On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:57 AM, John Drescher<dresche...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Victor Hugo dos > Santos<listas....@gmail.com> wrote:
[...] > You are not using the same exact dataset (145GB versus 140GB source > data ) in both tests so its meaningless that GZIP6 is better than > GZIP9. yes.. one report is a little more big that other, but are the same files in distinct dates and "only" 5GB of extra data !!! IMHO, serves of base of comparative. In the compression rate (point more important) of this 3 reports, the difference between GZIP6 and GZIP9 is of 0.1% but elapsed time is extremely distinct. bye -- -- Victor Hugo dos Santos Linux Counter #224399 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
