On 2011-07-12 05:38, Martin Simmons wrote: > Yes, that looks mostly normal. > > I would report that log output as a bug at bugs.bacula.org. > > I'm a little surprised that it specifically asked for the volume named FA0016 > though: > > 2011-07-10 03SD-loki JobId 6: Please mount Volume "FA0016" or label a new > one for: > > but you then issued the label command for that volume. > > Was FA0016 in the database already? If not, how did bacula predict the name?
Yes, I pre-populate the database with the range of tapes for each pool since I already have the bar coded tapes. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
