Hi, I also have a qnap nas for storing backups. I simply mount a nfs directory of the nas in the director, and launch backups against that mountpoint. It's the simplest way, and works flawlessly. No need to compile and/or install anything on the nas.
Regards El lun., 15 oct. 2018 22:32, Chris Wilkinson <winstonia...@gmail.com> escribió: > I use CIFS to mount 2 dissimilar NAS's on the DIR/FD/SD host. One is the > source, the other is the backup destination. It works just fine. I didn't > attempt to put the FD or SD on them natively since they are locked down > OS's. > > I took the precaution of mounting the source read only. > > I suppose NFS would work too but since I had CIFS mounts for other reasons > it seemed sensible to use that. > > Regards > > Chris Wilkinson > > On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, 8:18 p.m. Welington R. Braga, <welrbr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> Hi Andrea and others, >> >> I'm just a beginner in Bacula but I'm talking as who manager 4 QNAP NAS >> (1x TS-859U+, 3x TS-459U+) and others 2 similar storage like these in the >> last 6 years. So, if you let me give a humble opinion, configure only a NFS >> access and share this in your director/storage daemon and disable all the >> services and apps you will not use. >> >> The reasons are: >> 1st - It is the most simple protocol to configure and use in Linux >> Machine; >> 2nd - ISCSI is a most but, in this storage, when you create a LUN in fact >> it creates some big files mounted as loop devices, so, any problem in your >> machine means double problem to restore data, reduced performance of the >> box (compared with NFS it the same machine) and after some days (maybe >> months) of use this files will increase till the limit of storage and you >> start to receive alerts of disk-full >> 4th - As said, you have to maintain the same version of SD and DIR. >> Compile or look for packages for Linux is easier than to a proprietary NAS. >> >> Of course, it is based in my experience with these machines, and can not >> reflect the reality of your case. >> >> Regards, >> >> >> Em sex, 12 de out de 2018 às 09:52, Andrea Venturoli <m...@netfence.it> >> escreveu: >> >>> Hello. >>> >>> I know this question (more or less) came up several times in the past, >>> but possibly things have changed a lot. >>> >>> Is there any way I could install bacula storage daemon on the NAS in >>> subject? >>> There seems to be no QPKG available. >>> IPKG apparently disappeared. >>> I tried compiling it directly on the NAS, but there's no tools. >>> Is cross compiling the only way? Any tutorial then? >>> >>> Of course I could use NFS, but I'd *REALLY* like to avoid it. >>> >>> bye & Thanks >>> av. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bacula-users mailing list >>> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users >>> >> >> >> -- >> Welington Rodrigues Braga >> -------------- >> Web: http://www.welrbraga.eti.br >> Gtalk: welrbraga[*]gmail·com >> Yahoo / Skype: welrbraga >> PGP Key: 0x6C7654EB >> Linux User #253605 >> >> "Em tudo somos atribulados, porém não angustiados; perplexos, porém não >> desanimados; perseguidos, porém não desamparados; abatidos, porém não >> destruídos;" - 2Co 4:8,9 >> _______________________________________________ >> Bacula-users mailing list >> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users >
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
