On Tuesday 2019-04-16 09:45:29 Dmitri Maziuk via Bacula-users wrote: > On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 23:24:10 -0300 > > Marcio Demetrio Bacci <marcioba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 5. Currently the OS and Backup disks are on the same DRBD volume, so > > would it be better to put the OS disk out of the DRBD volume? (the VM > > has frequently crashing what makes me think that excessive writing on > > the disk may be impacting the OS) > > I would put everything out of drbd volume because quite frankly I don't > see the point. I don't think you can fail over in a middle of a backup, > and without that, why not just put OS on NFS? -- or ZFS and send > incremental snapshot as part of your manual failover. Using drbd for > backup storage is just a waste of disk.
NFS and DRBD are not really comparable that way. DRBD is block level replication and you can achieve redundancy at the block level. NFS is a network file system which could be setup on top of the DRBD provided block device and doesn't provide redundancy. > I'd also try to run bacula in a container instead of VM at this point. > but that's just me. It all depends on his environment. -- Josip Deanovic _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
