On 10.05.20 15:01, Kern Sibbald wrote: > I agree with Sven, libs3 is a big disaster. It works well but the > author abandoned it, and many things have changed since then. For the > moment, we have a version that works with AWS (don't expect it to work > with a number of other S3 implementations, which are not compatible with > AWS).
Adding to that: Other than the horrendous possible security flaws present in libs3 (try to compile with a recent GCC and see for yourself) the nature of anything cloud-bases is inherently volatile. The AWS-API may change at any given moment (and it has in the past), making libs3 incompatible without updates. And without an upstream author implementing those changes, your backups are more or less gone. My very pessimistic view on the situation is: Don't use any backup solution using libs3 if you value your data. But: YMMV. Grüße, Sven.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
