Considering there is an S3 storage daemon for bacula for 3 major versions now,
I would assume S3 is usable.
I would probably run a S3 storage daemon in each cloud type so you don't have
to pay high external transfer costs, unless there is a policy that says it has
to be backed up that way.
On July 20, 2023 3:26:02 AM EDT, rocky <rocky12.rocky...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi Team,
>
>Can anyone please advise on the below queries.
>
>1. Is it fine to configure the S3 bucket as storage in AWS cloud or is it
>better to take the backup on local EBS or EFS volumes?
>
>2. Currently we are using 3 different cloud environments AWS, OVH & GCP.
>So, We are looking for a centralized backup system.
>a) Is it possible to configure the Bacula master on AWS cloud and install
>the client on existing nodes on AWS and also on nodes on OVH and GCP cloud ?
>b) Is it possible to configure the storage device daemon on respective
>clouds So, that backup can be local on respective environments ?
>
>Thanks,
>Ramesh
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
