Am 24.06.25 um 08:41 schrieb Marcin Haba:
Hello Stefan,
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 at 07:47, Stefan G. Weichinger <li...@xunil.at> wrote:
Am 23.06.25 um 18:51 schrieb Marcin Haba:
It looks that your file records for that job are pruned. In this case
it is good to check and adapt the File Retention and AutoPrune
directives. To make sure that it is this case, you can run in bconsole
(for jobid=XXXX):
list files jobid=XXXX
If you are not seeing the file list, it means that the file records are pruned.
Why that? So far I have assumed that as long as tapes aren't
overwritten, the jobs on the volume also will have a file list in the
database. Did I get that wrong?
This is the way how automatic pruning works. To make it working in the
way as you described and as you expected, you can disable automatic
pruning:
AutoPrune = no
Then the file and job records will not be pruned automatically (and
the database size can be bigger). They will be pruned in the volume
recycling cycle or if you run prune job or file records manually by
Bconsole command.
ok ... so I don't have anything wrong that triggered that (?)
I still don't fully get it:
the volumes are in mode "Archive", so they should NOT yet been
overwritten (in fact they aren't: they are stored off-site).
And even then the related "file lists" in the database are pruned?
That's really new to me.
I expected the content of any volumes to be searchable in the DB.
Maybe that would be too much data, sure.
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
