On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:00:16 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a message dated 1/22/2005 8:58:17 PM Central Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > But it was under the supervision of the house? > The House commissioned it, the House did not write it. The House reviewed > it, they did not write it. The House made a decision to publish a book on > the topic, commissioned it and reviewed it for content, but it does not > reflect a consultative decision of the House in any particular. And, yes, > that makes a difference.
Is there an exhaustive statement somewhere which explains the difference between which actions, decisions, statements from the UHJ are infallible (in which sense?) and which are not? Peace Gilberto "My people are hydroponic" __________________________________________________ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
