Found this on Enbridge site: http://www.enbridge-expansion.com/WorkArea/showcontent.aspx?id=6656
On Sep 24, 10:56 am, bradaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure if it is only for N.D. oil as there is a spur line coming > from Canada. Here is Enbridge map > athttp://library.enbridge.com/users/folder.asp?FolderID=1667 > > On Sep 24, 10:21 am, go-devil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Is The Enbridge Pipeline only used for N.D. oil? > > > On Sep 24, 9:09 am, "Rufus O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I wonder if the good citizens of the state know exactly how much > > > money is being poured into facilitating Canadian vested interests. > > > While I do understand that international protocols are in place here, > > > I feel that ND should have a 'renegotiation' of the Canadian > > > contract. We need to build our infrastructure - not boost the > > > Canadian infrastructure. Correct me if I am wrong here, but isn't > > > the stuff from Canada mainly sour crudes and sour crude derivatives? > > > Meanwhile, the bakken sweet crude, needing less refining, has to > > > almost walk itself to a refinery... Not sure there is any solution > > > here, as international contracts were formed before the technology > > > changed that is allowing the bakken to produce in mass quantities... > > > We need to reclaim more space in the pipeline system for our own > > > production. While the US does benefit significantly from the incoming > > > Canadian production, we also need to benefit from our own new > > > production -- again, becoming self-supporting and independant from > > > other sources. > > > > On Sep 24, 9:55 am, bradaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Looks like about $371 mil is for getting Canadian crude or sand tars > > > > to US refineries. The Enbridge upgrade to 160,000 bpd was approved on > > > > July 2, 2008 and will likely be done in early 2010. > > > > > On Sep 24, 5:20 am, Traveler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I came across the following pdf which outlines the Major Pipeline > > > > > Projects for 2005-2008. > > > > > >http://www.psc.state.nd.us/consinfo/GraphicsJuly2008/Pipelines-indd.pdf > > > > > > The last item shows a Pending Approval Date - PAA is proposing a 6 > > > > > inch steel crude oil pipeline connecting its Killdeer Gathering System > > > > > and its Dickinson Gathering System, a distance of approximately 33 > > > > > miles with a capacity of about 10,000 bbls per day. Pumps will be > > > > > located at the current Killdeer. > > > > > > Total Investment in North Dakota = $584 Million- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bakken Shale Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bakken-shale-discussion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
