David, Brighams asking for Stand Up Spacing Units in Alger-Bakken Pool. What is a Stand Up? In a different case, same hearing a company is asking for 1280 spacing in Alger Bakken Pool Zone II. It also states: For which spacing has been established on the basis of one horizontal well per 1280 acres and such other relief as is appropriate. Are these the same Fields and different Zones? Is it one well per 1280 unless relief is needed, meaning another well? Thanks
On Sep 30, 8:25 am, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I honestly don't see any issue with this. If companies want to do two > mile laterals and believe that such an approach is working, which this > spacing permits, so be it. It looks to me like the plan is to > ultimately drill at least two wells per 1280 acre spacing, so in the > end they have well counts similar to one well per section spacings, > but with the longer laterals. Granted that the royalty payments get > divided up among mineral owners on both sections, and there may be > year long time lag before the second well is drilled, but this should > tend to smooth out royalties over time for every mineral owner. > > On Sep 30, 10:51 am, go-devil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > David, Larry, Teegue, > > I see in a Hearing reports for Oct. 08 that Brigham is pushing for 22 > > various 1280 Spacings, > > I know Hess permitted a 1280 combining Section 32 and 29 of 156/92. > > In Brighams request it asks for 1280 spacing on Section 32 of 156/92 > > with Section 5 of 155/92. > > Any ideas as to the outcome here? > > > On Sep 30, 4:47 am, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yesterday's 9/28/08 daily activity report was especially interesting > > > because it includes initial production information (ip) for a large > > > number of wells by many different drillers in the state including > > > several EOG wells just off confidential. > > > Linkhttps://www.dmr.nd.gov/oilgas/dailyindex.asp > > > > Of the wells listed the first place goes to EOG drilled Austin 26 in > > > SE Austin with an official ip of 3070 bopd. > > > > The silver medallian goes to EOG's School 16 on the south side of > > > Parshall TWP bringing in an official ip of 1721 bopd. > > > > On the other end we now know for sure that, sadly, Behm's Edwards 1 > > > was not a producer. > > > > We have producing wells coming in as low as 17 and 30 bopd. I wonder > > > how many of the wells coming in at 100 bopd or less will still be in > > > production a year from now..It takes 3-4 bopd I think just to cover > > > the costs of pump operation already in place. > > > > Can anyone tell me exactly what is going on with 17058 Shell Creek > > > State 1 01 drlled as a second well in 1 152 90 (Parshall TWP up by the > > > primary already producing "Long" well in that section). I know it was > > > scheduled to be a test well of some sort.The report says they drilled > > > to 13,459 ft into the Winnepeg formation, but apparently has not been > > > put into production. > > > > For those of you with EOG holes drilled awaiting the pooling hearing > > > for your section, a bunch of these are scheduled to take place on > > > October 23rd in Bismarck. Check the Oct 23rd hearing dockets page on > > > the dmr site, as this was just posted yesterday > > > . > > > Figure a minimum of 2-3 months from the hearing date to when a royalty > > > check shows up in your mailbox. :-) > > > > Those of you with a pooling hearing scheduled October 23rd should > > > receive legal papers within a few days I would think telling you the > > > official hearing has been scheduled and you can show up if in Bismarck > > > you are unhappy with the pooling scheme (not that it would do any > > > good, LOL).You can also listen in on the hearing live via the Web > > > starting at 9 AM on the scheduled hearing day. Most of this is routine > > > and if no owners are present to complain about something, the hearing > > > goes smoothly and very quickly. But occasionally someone wanders in to > > > raise an interesting issue. > > > After the hearing, the last step is for the title owners to do one > > > final check on who owns the mineral interest in each section, to make > > > absolutely certain there are no errors when the checks are cut. The > > > companies take extraordinary steps to assure the accuracy when they > > > get nearly to the check cutting stage, and that is why this seems to > > > take a little longer than it otherwise might. By the time you get your > > > first check,your well will likely have been producing for sale for > > > nearly 6 months. > > > The first check usually includes royalty payments for the first 2-3 > > > months of production combined.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bakken Shale Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bakken-shale-discussion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
