Thanks for the explanation Larry.
On Oct 31, 2:07 pm, Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wells can be on the confidential list when the only thing that has > happened is that a permit has been issued. > > Well 6454 was a producing well from 1978 thru the mid 1990's. > > St Mary is doing something or planning on doing something to this well > that allowed them to put whatever their plans are into the > confidential file. > > On Oct 31, 2:32 pm, seabass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I am assuming that "well file numbers" are assigned by the state in > > sequential order from oldest to newest. Lowest numbers were assigned > > going all the way back to the 1950's. I think the current numbers are > > reaching 18,000 or more by now. > > > I've notice on the Current Confidential Well List that there are quite > > a few wells that have low "well file numbers" like the ones listed > > below. The first one is file number 6454. > > > See : https://www.dmr.nd.gov/oilgas/confidential.asp > > > -------- > > 6454 ST MARY LAND & EXPLORATION COMPANY PET. INC. FEDERAL 20-44HR E2SE > > 20-T148N-R104W > > > Or > > > 15822 ZENERGY, INC ANDERSON 1-13H NWNW 13-T154N-R103W > > --------- > > It seems these both must be a very old (and fairly old) oil wells > > given their low file numbers. > > > I thought there was only a 6 month grace period where a well could be > > kept confidential. How could a well with a file number in the > > hundreds be listed as confidential? Am I missing something?- Hide quoted > > text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bakken Shale Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bakken-shale-discussion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
