Mbak Vieb, Pak Nyoman Suwela,
 
Pembangunan Tembok Kuta sepanjang 1500 m dengan biaya 4 milyar Rp.,
menunjukkan parahnya birokrasi kita. 
Pikiran pertama  birokrasi,  seperti mencari jelah, kesempatan  kreasi
proyek, yang disebut   proyect oriented.  
Bukannya  demand oriented yang didasarkan untuk memenuhi  kebutuhan utama,
meninngkatkan sarana wisata KUTA.
Apakah abrasi merupakan kebutuhan pertama, tentu masih bisa diperdebatkan?.
 
Birokrasi kita masih  tidak cerdik, untuk   mencari solusi optimal yang
memberi  solusi dengan biaya terendah (least cost). 
Birokrasi tak mau melepaskan kekuasaan (power ) mereka , keputusan agar
tetap dari atas ke bawah ( top down) dan proses
dari bawah ke atas (bottom up) tak mau dilakukan. 
Dengan demikian demokrasi belum jalan atau mati !
 
Tiada smart policy karena tidak adanya kesediaan untuk berdialog dengan
mengikutsertakan partisipasi public,
shareholder utama ialah masyarakat setempat, termasuk juga pendapat
masyarakat  wisatawan.
 
Solusi yang baik  dapat dilakukan dengan memakai jasa konsultan, apakah
dalam hal ini telah  dilakukan?.
Tetapi mengikutsertakan masyarakat  tetap diperlukan. Solusi tanam pohon
bukankah solusi yang lebih cerdas, murah, 
rindang, asri sekaligus bisa cegak abrasi?
 
Seandainya birokrasi dapat berpikir ke  demand oriented , penggunaan dana 4
(empat) milyar Rp., akan dapat  
dimanfaatkan untuk kebutuhan lain yang lebih penting (seperti perbaikan
sanitasi, parkir , lalu lintas KAWASAN KUTA).
 
Karena itu perbaikan  birokrasi ( Eksekutif, Legislatif, Judikatif)  perlu
dilakukan.
Proses Dengar Pendapat Birokrari dengan Masyarakat perlu dikembangkan.  
 
 
SALAM.
Nengah Sudja.
 
 
 
 
 
  _____  

From: bali-bou...@lp3b.or.id [mailto:bali-bou...@lp3b.or.id] On Behalf Of
Suwela
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 4:55 AM
To: bali@lp3b.or.id
Subject: [bali] Re: KUTA GREAT WALL - sharing
 
Stakeholders? Saya kira Sateholders. Saya pernah beli sate disana. Jadi
waktu itu saya juga "sateholder". Ha..ha..Kuta WAS a beach resort. It WAS
famous for its white sandy beach. Now it IS famous its beach wall. Ha..ha...
Nyoman Suwela
-----------------------------------------
Powered by Telkomsel BlackBerryR
  _____  

From: "Nengah Sudja" <nsu...@gmail.com> 
Sender: bali-bou...@lp3b.or.id
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:09:14 +0700
To: <bali@lp3b.or.id>; <bali-b...@yahoogroups.com>
ReplyTo: bali@lp3b.or.id 
Subject: [bali] Re: KUTA GREAT WALL - sharing
 
Mbak Vieb,
 
Seperti tembok Berlin ya.
 
Contoh proyek top down, semau gue.
 
Partisipasi  masyarakat tak ikut diajak.
 
Kasihan. 
 
 
SALAM.
Nengah Sudja.
 
  _____  

From: bali-bou...@lp3b.or.id [mailto:bali-bou...@lp3b.or.id] On Behalf Of
Asana Viebeke Lengkong
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 6:33 PM
To: bali@lp3b.or.id; bali-b...@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [bali] KUTA GREAT WALL - sharing
 

Tourists, experts reject 'Great Wall' of Kuta

Luh De Suriyani, The Jakarta Post, Kuta, Badung | Fri, 09/17/2010 10:19 AM |
Bali 
Danny Yatim, a frequent visitor to Bali, was startled when he saw a "great
wall" being built along the once-pristine Kuta Beach.

Over the last few months, Badung regional administration has been
constructing a two-meter concrete fence made from white sandstones, which
some said has also hidden the beauty of the white sands and great waves of
Kuta Beach.

The project is estimated to cost over Rp 4 billion (US$444,000) to complete
is intended to protect Kuta and Legian area from tidal and sea abrasion.
Fences that will span more than 1,500 meters will be built along Kuta and
Legian Beach, Bali's most famous tourist destinations.

"For those travelling to Kuta, here's another weird development that I call
'Kuta Wall'. If you are driving, riding, walking, strolling on the main road
or sipping coffee at a ground floor cafe, you can no longer see the blue
ocean. So, sorry guy, just enjoy the wall," shared Danny.

Dozens of people shared unfavorable comments on the "Kuta Wall" on social
networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook. 

"I just wonder why the local government is building such an environmentally
unfriendly construction," Danny said.

Visitors could only view the wall instead of the beautiful beach when
strolling along Kuta area, he added.

Kuta resident and activist Asanna Vibeke Lengkong said that the local
administration should not build such a wall.

"They could plant trees or other vegetation to protect the areas from
abrasion.

"[Kuta  Beach] can still look friendly, open and beautiful," Lengkong said.

Kuta and Legian are located in Badung regency, the richest of the island's
eight regencies and mayoralties. 

"[Badung administration] has a lot of money and they do not know how to
spend it. Nothing is spent on the poor or for education. They should spend
it on education, health and people's welfare instead of building such a
wall," Lengkong said.

The walls were built using traditional elaborate Balinese architectural
motifs. 

The gates in front of Hard Rock Hotel were built in homage to Bentar Temple
in a style reserved for royal palaces, big temples and important buildings.
The construction of the gates near the hotel cost 
Rp 500 million, she said.

Badung administration spokesman I Gede Wijaya said that the walls were built
with three principals in mind.

First, Wijaya said that previous fences, which had been comprised of stone
walls and plants, did not reflect Balinese architectural motifs. 

Second, many tourists lodged complaints that Kuta Beach produces abundant
sand storms during the rainy season.

Third, Wijaya said that Bentar Temple and the walls could be beautiful
backdrops for photographers. "We do not take the protests seriously. It's
common for people to do that. We did outreach programs prior to starting
construction," Wijaya said.

Project head Retno Hapsari said that she has already consulted with all
stakeholders in Kuta, including hotel owners, community leaders and other
related parties. 

"All of them agreed to the project," she argued.

Noted architect Yoka Sara said that the construction of concrete walls at
public facilities was not necessary. 

"True Balinese architecture has no need for fences in public places such as
markets, cemeteries and other public areas," Sara said.

The development of fences and gates using the grand styles of Balinese
architecture is a waste of money and not functional, she added.

"It is easy for the local administration to spend money unwisely. The
buildings should not be designed with such an elaborate style. Physically,
the walls create uncomfortable and unfriendly atmosphere for visitors," Sara
said.
 

Kirim email ke