Hi Michiel:

On 05/25/2019 09:20:03 AM Sat, Peter Bloomfield wrote:
…
 I just built Balsa from it with:

/configure --with-libsecret --with-gtksourceview --with-gpgme

That's './configure --with-libsecret --with-gtksourceview --with-gpgme'
                 ^
of course😊️

make
src/balsa

and  again it shows no HTML content.

I'm puzzled about what has happened. I was using Balsa built from git's master 
branch around the time the tarball was made, and I don't recall any version 
that had HTML issues. Balsa's HTML code has seen a few changes since 25.6 was 
released, and of course WebKit has been updated continually, but as far as I 
know none of the changes were related to a blank page.

So if I understand correctly, upgrading to F30 won't resolve the issue?
So I guess the best way to proceed is to file a bug at Fedora? I have a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com account. (Any addional information I should
submit?)

So no, a Fedora bug would just be bumped upstream, because any build from that 
tarball can show the issue. Waiting for the forthcoming new release may be the 
best option.

…and 2.5.7 was in the works as I wrote![0] I tested the tarball with the same 
configure options, and it renders HTML content correctly. A Fedora package 
should be available soon.

Best

Peter (still puzzled about 2.5.6…)

[0] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/balsa-list/2019-May/msg00018.html

Attachment: pgpH2bMyUO_i2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
balsa-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list

Reply via email to