balsa-2.5.7 is now in rawhide. I haven't pushed it to F30 yet. It sounds we have a reason to do that, does it not?
Pawel On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 1:16 AM Peter Bloomfield < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Michiel: > > On 05/25/2019 09:20:03 AM Sat, Peter Bloomfield wrote: > … > > I just built Balsa from it with: > > > > /configure --with-libsecret --with-gtksourceview --with-gpgme > > That's './configure --with-libsecret --with-gtksourceview --with-gpgme' > ^ > of course😊️ > > > make > > src/balsa > > > > and again it shows no HTML content. > > > > I'm puzzled about what has happened. I was using Balsa built from git's > master branch around the time the tarball was made, and I don't recall any > version that had HTML issues. Balsa's HTML code has seen a few changes > since 25.6 was released, and of course WebKit has been updated continually, > but as far as I know none of the changes were related to a blank page. > > > >> So if I understand correctly, upgrading to F30 won't resolve the issue? > >> So I guess the best way to proceed is to file a bug at Fedora? I have a > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com account. (Any addional information I should > >> submit?) > > > > So no, a Fedora bug would just be bumped upstream, because any build > from that tarball can show the issue. Waiting for the forthcoming new > release may be the best option. > > …and 2.5.7 was in the works as I wrote![0] I tested the tarball with the > same configure options, and it renders HTML content correctly. A Fedora > package should be available soon. > > Best > > Peter (still puzzled about 2.5.6…) > > [0] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/balsa-list/2019-May/msg00018.html > _______________________________________________ > balsa-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list >
_______________________________________________ balsa-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/balsa-list
