Wa alaykum salaam Brother Kaukab, Thank you for your explanation. As for your magazine, you are right. I do not read it as much as I'd like to. I have the same situation though, with my website freedetainees.org. I see people talking about those issues with surprise and I always think - if they'd only been following along they would know! I am usually so busy on keeping up with detainee news that I rarely get time for much else. However, I have a day tomorrow - and I will try and catch up!
shukran for the reminder! kaukab siddique wrote: > Dear sis. Taliba > asalamu alaikum > > I tried to explain this to Sis. Anisa before. > Obama is very sophisticated. He is not planning to talk to the Taliban > but to former Taliban. The move is going through the Saudis. The > purpose is to split the Taliban and thus isolate al-Qaida. > Mullah Umar, leader of the Islamic resistance, has rejected any peace > talks as long as occupation forces are in the country. > I guess you don't read my Internet magazine New Trend otherwise you > would know all this. > > www.newtrendmag.org <http://www.newtrendmag.org> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > To: [email protected] > From: [email protected] > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:26:06 -0700 > Subject: Re: [bangla-vision] OK for US to talk to Taliban but not Hamas? > > So true! Aameen! > > Abu Zahrin Abu Bakar wrote: > > they want to talk to taliban because they are fighting a losing > war but no > talking to Hamas , non of their concern , except they are real > hypocrites, > not able to differentiate between freedom fighters(Hamas) , and > zionist war mongerers > at the expense of the American tax payers, they are blind in the > eyes as well in the hearts.unless to morrow they revert to islam > then only they will see the light and the truth , pray for them to > see the light, ameen! > > --- On *Mon, 3/23/09, Anisa Abd el Fattah /<[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected]>/* wrote: > > > From: Anisa Abd el Fattah <[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [bangla-vision] OK for US to talk to Taliban but > not Hamas? > To: [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > Date: Monday, March 23, 2009, 12:00 PM > > The real hypocrisy and truth is that our government claims > that the Taliban and Al Qadea murdered 3000 Americans on Sept. > 11, 2001, yet they are willing to talk to them. Hamas is a > resistance organization that is fighting for the very > existence of the Palestinian people, who has never done > anything to the US, yet we call them terrorists. This makes it > clear who is running US foreign policy. We can talk to the > Taliban because they are goyim who kill goyim. We cannot talk > to Hamas because they are goyim who fight Zionist Jews the so > called chosen people. If you don't think that the US and > Europe are under Zionist rule, think again. > > Anisa > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:01 AM, liz allen <spktruthtopower@ > yahoo.com <http:///mc/[email protected]>> > wrote: > > Well thats because you have Hillary Clinton, and Dennis > Ross...making sure there is never a meeting with the > democratically elected government.. ..Hamas! Taliban has > no government, never elected to anything...more double > standards... Mr. President. > > ----- Forwarded Message ---- > *From:* Anisa Abd el Fattah <anisaab...@gmail. com > <http:///mc/[email protected]>> > *To:* Anisa Abd el Fattah <anisaab...@gmail. com > <http:///mc/[email protected]>> > *Sent:* Monday, March 23, 2009 10:14:03 AM > *Subject:* [AmeriConscience] OK for US to talk to Taliban > but not Hamas? > > > OK to talk to the Taliban but not Hamas? - by Osama Abu Katta > Date: 22 / 03 / 2009 Time: 15: 09 > http://www.maannews .net/en/index. php?opr=ShowDeta > ils&ID=36611 > <http://www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&ID=36611> > ????? ???? > > <http://www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&ID=36611#>????? > ???? > <http://www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&ID=36611#> > > > <http://www.maanimages.com/index.php?opr=Details&ID=56261> > [Ma'anImages] > > US President Obama said throughout his campaign that he > would meet with his Iranian counterpart. At the time, > Senator Hillary Clinton opposed him and suggested that > this was naïve. > > Meanwhile, reports from London talked about a line of > communication or dialogue between Hizbullah and British > officials, a European parliamentary delegation recently > met with members of Hamas' political leadership in exile > in Damascus to discuss ways to end the group's > international isolation, and the media also reported that > the White House did not rule out negotiations with the > Taliban. > > In an obvious contradiction to this flow of American and > Western diplomacy, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made > it clear to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas that the > promised financial aid to Gaza is conditioned on > prohibiting any access to this aid by Hamas. Moreover > Clinton made it clear that Hamas must comply with the > Quartet's demands, mainly that Hamas must acknowledge > Israel's right to exist, before joining a unity government > and having access to the US aid. > > Hamas is standing at a critical junction and facing > mounting pressure to make some time-sensitive decisions on > a wide range of issues. Recovering from the Gaza war, > breaking the siege on Gaza, negotiations with Israel on a > long-term truce, negotiations on a prisoner swap and > Fatah-Hamas reconciliation talks are all urgent and > sensitive negotiations, especially in light of Israeli > political developments and its government changes. The > stakes are high for Hamas but the price is just as high. > Any compromises to be made by Hamas will assuredly mean a > significant change in the political map of the region. > > Hamas' compliance with the Quartet's conditions could open > the door for the movement to take part in a Palestinian > national unity government that is able to deal with the > international community and end the siege, which could > facilitate and perhaps even speed up the Palestinian > national reconciliation process as a whole. > > A national unity government is without a doubt a pressing > popular national Palestinian demand that Hamas is very > aware of and would give Hamas legitimacy as well as > grounds to work in the West Bank. Compliance with the > Quartet's conditions would also mean giving Hamas access > to the international stage, something Hamas has been eager > to achieve for a long time. Such a compromise, though, > would at the same time cost Hamas dearly if it is made > without approval from Syria and Iran, who are considered > Hamas' backbone and its strongest supporters in the region. > > Analysts think the key to any advancement in the internal > Palestinian situation on one hand and the Palestinian- > Israeli situation on the other must be parallel to > regional negotiations that involve Syria and Iran. > > One factor that strengthens Hamas' negotiating power with > Fatah is the fact that the new Israeli government is > hardcore right wing, and refuses a two-state solution to > the Palestinian- Israeli conflict, promotes the expansion > of settlements and rejects any negotiations on Jerusalem. > Such an Israeli government undermines Abbas and the rest > of the "Arab moderate leaders," and automatically empowers > Hamas and other resistance groups in the West Bank and Gaza. > > Critics of the US policy of not negotiating with Hamas > ask: Is Hamas more of a threat to the US than the Taliban > and Iran? How can the US justify talking to one group > categorized as a terrorist entity but not another one? > > Media reports from Egypt noted that Egypt has dispatched > two of its top officials to convince the Americans and the > Europeans to accept a weaker commitment by Hamas to peace > with Israel for the sake of forging a united Palestinian > government. The US and Europe will have to decide soon on > the nature of the relationship they want to have with > Hamas and the upcoming Israeli government keeping in mind > that both were democratically elected. > > Refusing to talk to Hamas while embracing a right-wing > Israeli government would be considered an early blow to > President Osama's efforts to send a different message to > the Middle East than did his predecessor George W. Bush. > > > > > Print Preview > > <http://www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&Do=Print&ID=36611> > > Send to friend > > <http://www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&Do=Friend&Op=FriendSend&ID=36611> > > > > > > > > > -- > Linda > *http://freedetainees.org <http://freedetainees.org/> > "If we shadows have offended, Think but this, > and all is mended, That you have but slumber'd > here While these visions did appear..." > - William Shakespeare > * > > > > > -- Linda *http://freedetainees.org <http://freedetainees.org/> "If we shadows have offended, Think but this, and all is mended, That you have but slumber'd here While these visions did appear..." - William Shakespeare * --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bangla-vision" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bangla-vision?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
