I agree!  It's been tried many times before - usually covertly.  In fact 
I'd have to say that at least 75% of the problems in Central and South 
America were the result of just that.  Anyway... good post..

Anisa Abd el Fattah wrote:
> Kaukab, one of the pundits said what you have been saying today. I 
> don't remember who said it, but they said that the US wants to try to 
> split Taliban between moderates and hardliners. This is an old, old 
> strategy that never works.
>
> Anisa
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Linda G. Richard 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Wa alaykum salaam Brother Kaukab,
>
>     Thank you for your explanation.  As for your magazine, you are
>     right.  I do not read it as much as I'd like to.  I have the same
>     situation though, with my website freedetainees.org
>     <http://freedetainees.org>.  I see people talking about those
>     issues with surprise and I always think - if they'd only been
>     following along they would know!  I am usually so busy on keeping
>     up with detainee news that I rarely get time for much else. 
>     However, I have a day tomorrow - and I will try and catch up!
>
>     shukran for the reminder!
>
>
>
>
>     kaukab siddique wrote:
>>     Dear sis. Taliba
>>     asalamu alaikum
>>      
>>     I tried to explain this to Sis. Anisa before.
>>     Obama is very sophisticated. He is not planning to talk to the
>>     Taliban but to former Taliban. The move is going through the
>>     Saudis. The purpose is to split the Taliban and thus isolate
>>     al-Qaida.
>>     Mullah Umar, leader of the Islamic resistance, has rejected any
>>     peace talks as long as occupation forces are in the country.
>>     I guess you don't read my Internet magazine New Trend otherwise
>>     you would know all this.
>>      
>>     www.newtrendmag.org <http://www.newtrendmag.org>
>>
>>      
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     To: [email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:26:06 -0700
>>     Subject: Re: [bangla-vision] OK for US to talk to Taliban but not
>>     Hamas?
>>
>>     So true!  Aameen!
>>
>>     Abu Zahrin Abu Bakar wrote:
>>
>>         they want to talk to taliban because they are fighting a
>>         losing war but no
>>         talking to Hamas , non  of their concern , except they are
>>         real hypocrites,
>>         not able to differentiate between freedom fighters(Hamas) , 
>>         and zionist  war mongerers
>>         at the expense of the American tax payers, they are blind in
>>         the  eyes as well in the hearts.unless to morrow they revert
>>         to islam  then only they will see the light and the truth ,
>>         pray for them to see the light, ameen!
>>
>>         --- On *Mon, 3/23/09, Anisa Abd el Fattah
>>         /<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>/* wrote:
>>
>>
>>             From: Anisa Abd el Fattah <[email protected]>
>>             <mailto:[email protected]>
>>             Subject: Re: [bangla-vision] OK for US to talk to Taliban
>>             but not Hamas?
>>             To: [email protected]
>>             <mailto:[email protected]>
>>             Date: Monday, March 23, 2009, 12:00 PM
>>
>>             The real hypocrisy and truth is that our government
>>             claims that the Taliban and Al Qadea murdered 3000
>>             Americans on Sept. 11, 2001, yet they are willing to talk
>>             to them. Hamas is a resistance organization that is
>>             fighting for the very existence of the Palestinian
>>             people, who has never done anything to the US, yet we
>>             call them terrorists. This makes it clear who is running
>>             US foreign policy. We can talk to the Taliban because
>>             they are goyim who kill goyim. We cannot talk to Hamas
>>             because they are goyim who fight Zionist Jews the so
>>             called chosen people. If you don't think that the US and
>>             Europe are under Zionist rule, think again.
>>
>>             Anisa
>>
>>
>>             On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:01 AM, liz allen
>>             <spktruthtopower@ yahoo.com
>>             <http:///mc/[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>                 Well thats because you have Hillary Clinton, and
>>                 Dennis Ross...making sure there is never a meeting
>>                 with the democratically elected government..
>>                 ..Hamas!  Taliban has no government, never elected to
>>                 anything...more double standards... Mr. President.
>>
>>                 ----- Forwarded Message ----
>>                 *From:* Anisa Abd el Fattah <anisaab...@gmail. com
>>                 <http:///mc/[email protected]>>
>>                 *To:* Anisa Abd el Fattah <anisaab...@gmail. com
>>                 <http:///mc/[email protected]>>
>>                 *Sent:* Monday, March 23, 2009 10:14:03 AM
>>                 *Subject:* [AmeriConscience] OK for US to talk to
>>                 Taliban but not Hamas?
>>
>>
>>                 OK to talk to the Taliban but not Hamas? - by Osama
>>                 Abu Katta
>>                 Date: 22 / 03 / 2009  Time:  15: 09    
>>                 http://www.maannews .net/en/index. php?opr=ShowDeta
>>                 ils&ID=36611
>>                 
>> <http://www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&ID=36611>
>>                      ????? ????
>>                 
>> <http://www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&ID=36611#>?????
>>                 ????
>>                 
>> <http://www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&ID=36611#>
>>
>>
>>                 <http://www.maanimages.com/index.php?opr=Details&ID=56261>
>>
>>                 [Ma'anImages]
>>
>>                 US President Obama said throughout his campaign that
>>                 he would meet with his Iranian counterpart. At the
>>                 time, Senator Hillary Clinton opposed him and
>>                 suggested that this was naïve.
>>
>>                 Meanwhile, reports from London talked about a line of
>>                 communication or dialogue between Hizbullah and
>>                 British officials, a European parliamentary
>>                 delegation recently met with members of Hamas'
>>                 political leadership in exile in Damascus to discuss
>>                 ways to end the group's international isolation, and
>>                 the media also reported that the White House did not
>>                 rule out negotiations with the Taliban.
>>
>>                 In an obvious contradiction to this flow of American
>>                 and Western diplomacy, Secretary of State Hillary
>>                 Clinton made it clear to Palestinian President
>>                 Mahmoud Abbas that the promised financial aid to Gaza
>>                 is conditioned on prohibiting any access to this aid
>>                 by Hamas. Moreover Clinton made it clear that Hamas
>>                 must comply with the Quartet's demands, mainly that
>>                 Hamas must acknowledge Israel's right to exist,
>>                 before joining a unity government and having access
>>                 to the US aid.
>>
>>                 Hamas is standing at a critical junction and facing
>>                 mounting pressure to make some time-sensitive
>>                 decisions on a wide range of issues. Recovering from
>>                 the Gaza war, breaking the siege on Gaza,
>>                 negotiations with Israel on a long-term truce,
>>                 negotiations on a prisoner swap and Fatah-Hamas
>>                 reconciliation talks are all urgent and sensitive
>>                 negotiations, especially in light of Israeli
>>                 political developments and its government changes.
>>                 The stakes are high for Hamas but the price is just
>>                 as high. Any compromises to be made by Hamas will
>>                 assuredly mean a significant change in the political
>>                 map of the region.
>>
>>                 Hamas' compliance with the Quartet's conditions could
>>                 open the door for the movement to take part in a
>>                 Palestinian national unity government that is able to
>>                 deal with the international community and end the
>>                 siege, which could facilitate and perhaps even speed
>>                 up the Palestinian national reconciliation process as
>>                 a whole.
>>
>>                 A national unity government is without a doubt a
>>                 pressing popular national Palestinian demand that
>>                 Hamas is very aware of and would give Hamas
>>                 legitimacy as well as grounds to work in the West
>>                 Bank. Compliance with the Quartet's conditions would
>>                 also mean giving Hamas access to the international
>>                 stage, something Hamas has been eager to achieve for
>>                 a long time. Such a compromise, though, would at the
>>                 same time cost Hamas dearly if it is made without
>>                 approval from Syria and Iran, who are considered
>>                 Hamas' backbone and its strongest supporters in the
>>                 region.
>>
>>                 Analysts think the key to any advancement in the
>>                 internal Palestinian situation on one hand and the
>>                 Palestinian- Israeli situation on the other must be
>>                 parallel to regional negotiations that involve Syria
>>                 and Iran.
>>
>>                 One factor that strengthens Hamas' negotiating power
>>                 with Fatah is the fact that the new Israeli
>>                 government is hardcore right wing, and refuses a
>>                 two-state solution to the Palestinian- Israeli
>>                 conflict, promotes the expansion of settlements and
>>                 rejects any negotiations on Jerusalem. Such an
>>                 Israeli government undermines Abbas and the rest of
>>                 the "Arab moderate leaders," and automatically
>>                 empowers Hamas and other resistance groups in the
>>                 West Bank and Gaza.
>>
>>                 Critics of the US policy of not negotiating with
>>                 Hamas ask: Is Hamas more of a threat to the US than
>>                 the Taliban and Iran? How can the US justify talking
>>                 to one group categorized as a terrorist entity but
>>                 not another one?
>>
>>                 Media reports from Egypt noted that Egypt has
>>                 dispatched two of its top officials to convince the
>>                 Americans and the Europeans to accept a weaker
>>                 commitment by Hamas to peace with Israel for the sake
>>                 of forging a united Palestinian government. The US
>>                 and Europe will have to decide soon on the nature of
>>                 the relationship they want to have with Hamas and the
>>                 upcoming Israeli government keeping in mind that both
>>                 were democratically elected.
>>
>>                 Refusing to talk to Hamas while embracing a
>>                 right-wing Israeli government would be considered an
>>                 early blow to President Osama's efforts to send a
>>                 different message to the Middle East than did his
>>                 predecessor George W. Bush.
>>
>>
>>                              
>>
>>                     Print Preview
>>                 
>> <http://www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&Do=Print&ID=36611>
>>
>>                     Send to friend
>>                 
>> <http://www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&Do=Friend&Op=FriendSend&ID=36611>
>>
>>
>>                              
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Linda
>>     *http://freedetainees.org <http://freedetainees.org/>
>>     "If we shadows have offended, Think but this,
>>     and all is mended, That you have but slumber'd
>>     here While these visions did appear..."
>>     - William Shakespeare
>>     *
>>
>>
>
>     -- 
>     Linda
>     *http://freedetainees.org <http://freedetainees.org/>
>     "If we shadows have offended, Think but this,
>     and all is mended, That you have but slumber'd
>     here While these visions did appear..."
>     - William Shakespeare
>     *
>
>
>
>
> 

-- 
Linda
*http://freedetainees.org <http://freedetainees.org/>
"If we shadows have offended, Think but this,
and all is mended, That you have but slumber'd
here While these visions did appear..."
- William Shakespeare
*


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"bangla-vision" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/bangla-vision?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to