On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
<abpil...@gmail.com> wrote:
[..]
> For example, this is a very common way of doing a select using PHP.
>
> $query = "SELECT * FROM products WHERE name=’$productname’";
> mysql_query($query);
>
> Only that this kind of SQL is very vulnerable to SQL injection attacks
> because
> $productname can be replaced with malicious SQL code from outside.
>
> The correct way to do this would be,
>
> $query = sprintf("SELECT * FROM products WHERE name=’%s’",
> mysql_real_escape_string($productname));
> mysql_query($query);
>
> However, in Python due to some features like multiline strings and
> templating using a dictionary, these kind of issues are more easily
> avoided.
>
> example
>
> query="""SELECT * from Products WHERE name=%s AND timestamp>=%s"""
> cursor.execute(query % ('burger', '2009-09-10 12:00:00')
I'm not sure I understand here. You're using constants here ('burger'
and '2009...') but variables in the PHP version. Since constants are
in your own code, they're trusted data but since the variables could
contain values from the outside, you're still vulnerable to SQL
injection unless you sanitise them. If you had a variable (say foo)
instead of 'burger' and that had some malicious SQL injection attempt,
you'd be vulnerable exactly like in the PHP version wouldn't you? Are
you saying you don't need to escape the variables in the Python
version? I haven't played with the raw dbapi for a long time so I
might be just spouting nonsense here.
> It is not easy to use SQL injection against code like above so the
> default Python string templating is a bit more secure than the one
> provided by PHP. You don't need to go through the pain of
> mysql_escape_string to escape the SQL params which is the solution
> offered in the PHP world.
I'm not sure I see the difference. Assuming you get two variables from
the outside product and date which contain the query parameters, what
would happen here?
query="""SELECT * from Products WHERE name=%s AND timestamp>=%s"""
product = "''; SHOW DATABASES;" # SQL Injection attempt
date = '2009-09-10 12:00:00'
print query%(product,date)
SELECT * from Products WHERE name=''; SHOW DATABASES; AND
timestamp>=2009-09-10 12:00:00
which would get screwed no?
> This is just one example. Basically it is a fact that the clean, minimal
> syntax of Python with no "hackish" features does make it a more
> secure language, if not intentional then accidental. Anyway it is good
> news for Python developers.
I think the language quality amplifies programmer skill. IF you have
two entry level PHP and Python programmers, I'm willing to bet that
they're code will be somewhat similar and language specific goodness
will not be there. As they become skilled, their ability to exploit
languages become better and the differences will be sharper. So, a
mature product hacked upon by good programmers will be considerably
better if it's in a 'superior' language. I think Drupal and Plone
come into that category so the security argument holds. However, for
an average programmer doing a typical program, PHP vs. Python won't
make *much* of a difference except decide her future.
--
~noufal
http://nibrahim.net.in
_______________________________________________
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
