On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 11:29 PM Ahmad Fatoum <a.fat...@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
> Hello Andrey,
>
> On 26/5/19 23:55, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 8:56 AM Ahmad Fatoum <a.fat...@pengutronix.de> 
> > wrote:
> >>
> > This particular patch does break a non 6Q+ version of RDU2,  but the
> > follow up ones in the series fix it, so it seems that no action is
> > really necessary on my part.
>
> The reparenting removed in this patch isn't reinstated by the rest of the 
> series.
> They merely apply parentage expressed in the device tree in a glitch-free 
> manner.
>
> As both barebox and kernel imx6qdl-zii-rdu2.dtsi lack the relevant
> assigned-clock-parents snippet, I am not sure what it is this patch broke 
> that the
> follow-up ones fixed?

Not sure, will investigate.

>
> Generally, affected boards have been broken since day 1, because the LVDS 
> output
> would've locked up every blue moon or so. If this patch breaks them, they're 
> just
> more reliably broken. :-)
>

There's a world of difference between not working every once in a blue
moon and not working from a first boot.

Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Reply via email to