On 09/19/2011 01:09 PM, Con Kolivas wrote: > Thanks Jari. I don't mind that file being included int he bash completion > package instead of lrzip itself. I simply was not aware of whose > responsibility the completion file was. I'd like to tag and release a clean > 0.608 version to avoid this problem on other distros too.
I wasn't aware of lrzip shipping its completion either. There are upsides and downsides to having completions shipped in corresponding packages or bash-completion, but in my personal opinion, if done properly, it's a bit better overall if they're in the corresponding upstream packages. Let us know how you intend to proceed with this; if you prefer to continue shipping the completion with lrzip, I'll do what we usually do in cases like this: deprecate the one in bash-completion, rename it with an underscore prefix to avoid file level conflicts, and not install it by default. _______________________________________________ Bash-completion-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bash-completion-devel
