On 09/20/2011 01:39 AM, Con Kolivas wrote: > I'd much rather it stayed part of the bash completion package, but could > you possibly use this new one instead
The one in lrzip seems to have some drawbacks over the one in bash-completion and generally doesn't match bash-completion's style, so I did not adopt it wholesale. But -? and -p handling are now in bash-completion git, the latter in somewhat more portable fashion than in the one included with lrzip. > since it appears more complete? By the way this highlights the biggest benefit of having completions upstream: they have a better chance of being up to date / complete with the corresponding software than when they're in bash-completion. (The Fedora 14 version of lrzip I initially wrote the lrzip completion for did not have the two above mentioned options.) _______________________________________________ Bash-completion-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bash-completion-devel
