The article is kinda bunk. It sounds mostly anecdotal, with no actual facts and research put into it. I read through some of the comments at the bottom and most of the counter arguments make sense. I am also not too sure what the article is actually about, is it more focused on the people who take excessive amounts (not the 200 mg or whatever that is recommended every 4 hours), or is it just in general? And didn't people who support Sarah Palin boo the reading of New York Times? And what does this have to do with Dante and the Quick-Stop?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bashing Pinatas" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bashingpinatas?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
