Without some context (code snippet, svg sample, etc), I'm a bit limited in
the help I can offer.
I've seen odd behavior like this in 2 cases...Yours may not fall into either
since it works outside the unit test, but it's worth a shot.
1) The document is tampered with before SVG/GVT are fully initialized.
Using the following eliminates the need for sleep/check routines for a
loaded doc. Note the comments indicating proper/improper places to begin
document modification.
Example:
svgCanvas.setDocumentState(JSVGCanvas.ALWAYS_DYNAMIC);
svgCanvas.addGVTTreeBuilderListener(new GVTTreeBuilderAdapter() {
@Override
public void gvtBuildCompleted(GVTTreeBuilderEvent e) {
//MODIFY DOCUMENT HERE
}
});
InputStream templateStream =
Canvas.class.getResourceAsStream("mydoc.svg");
String parser = XMLResourceDescriptor.getXMLParserClassName();
SAXSVGDocumentFactory f = new SAXSVGDocumentFactory(parser);
SVGDocument doc = null;
try {
doc = f.createSVGDocument(null, templateStream);
} catch (IOException ex) {
Logger.getLogger(Canvas.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null,
ex);
} finally {
if(templateStream != null) {
try {
templateStream.close();
} catch (IOException ex) {
logger.log(Level.WARNING, null, ex);
}
}
}
doc.setDocumentURI("myuri");
// DON'T MODIFY DOCUMENT HERE
2) Modification of the document (add/remove/update any svg node) outside of
the UpdateRunnableQueue. All modifications should be wrapped..
getUpdateManager().getUpdateRunnableQueue().invokeLater(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
// MODIFY DOCUMENT HERE
}
});
feel free to share more info if your issue persists.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Martin Gainty <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Jonathan
>
> from what i've seen the invocation of the JFCUnit tests are producing the
> abending lll attribute causing the offense
> It looks as if you'll need some session-management to determine who the
> culprit is here is an example:
>
> execute JFCUnit-Test-Session1:
> bash>grep --files-with-matches --recursive attribute
> JFCUnit produces attributes fu
>
> execute JFCUnit-Test-Session2:
> bash>grep --files-with-matches --recursive attribute
> JFCUnit produces attributes fubar
>
> execute JFCUnit-Test-Session3:
> bash>grep --files-with-matches --recursive attribute
> JFCUnit produces attributes lll
>
> Martin Gainty
> ______________________________________________
> Jogi és Bizalmassági kinyilatkoztatás/Verzicht und
> Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité
>
> Ez az üzenet bizalmas. Ha nem ön az akinek szánva volt, akkor kérjük, hogy
> jelentse azt nekünk vissza. Semmiféle továbbítása vagy másolatának készítése
> nem megengedett. Ez az üzenet csak ismeret cserét szolgál és semmiféle jogi
> alkalmazhatósága sincs. Mivel az electronikus üzenetek könnyen
> megváltoztathatóak, ezért minket semmi felelöség nem terhelhet ezen üzenet
> tartalma miatt.
>
> Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene
> Empfaenger sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte
> Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht
> dient lediglich dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine
> rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von
> E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen.
>
> Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le
> destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire informez
> l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie de ceci
> est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas
> n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email
> peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter
> aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> From: [email protected]
> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:35:49 -0500
> Subject: Re: Batik and JUnit
> To: [email protected]
>
>
> Can you share your initialization/document load routine and the handoff to
> junit?
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:50 PM, shootist <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> I am attempting to run some unit tests under JFCUnit and JUnit. I also
> have
> a recorder that uses java robot to perform some tests.
>
> Anytime I modify anything, or even sometimes just starting the code without
> running any actual tests I get svg errors. Sometimes It's just a null,
> sometimes it tells me there is an invalid attribute (for example, I get an
> error message saying "lll" is not a valid attribute for "pointer-events"),
> and sometimes I get CSS exceptions.
>
> I don't see anyplace in the code where I set any attribute to lll, and I
> don't have any problems running the code. This only happens within the
> unit
> tests.
>
> I suspect something strange is happening with threading, and the unit tests
> are not waiting for the UpdateManager to complete, but no amount of sleep
> calls seem to help. Has anyone experienced these problems?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://batik.2283329.n4.nabble.com/Batik-and-JUnit-tp3087741p3087741.html
> Sent from the Batik - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>
