On Saturday, February 12, 2011, 2:08:38 AM, jonathan wrote: jw> H Chris & Tim.
jw> I think that the confusion comes from an example in the spec, jw> section 7.10 Units. Without context, the reader might pick out the 1pt == 1.25px... Thanks for the helpful pointer. I agree that this example could be taken as a general statement, and I will make sure it is reworded to clarify that this is one particular example. jw> my 2 cents jw> --- clip jw> jw> The other absolute unit identifiers from CSS (i.e., pt, jw> pc, cm, mm, in) are all defined as an appropriate multiple jw> of one px unit (which, according to the previous item, is jw> defined to be equal to one user unit), based on what the jw> SVG user agent determines is the size of a px unit (possibly jw> passed from the parent processor or environment at jw> initialization time). For example, suppose that the user jw> agent can determine from its environment that "1px" jw> corresponds to "0.2822222mm" (i.e., 90dpi). This sentence in particular could mislead: jw> Then, for all processing of SVG content: -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
