Thus spake Werner Guttmann: > Hi, > > in one of our projects, we are currently using the PNGTranscoder to > produce a PNG from an SVG, and everything works just fine (in terms of > expected output, content, ...). As part of some recent testing, we came > to realize that the PNGs produced are of differing physical byte sizes > on different machines. > > E.g. a PNG image of dimension 1620x1118 px one one box has a size of > 10,836 bytes, whereas a second server produces 10,864 bytes worth of PNG > from the very same SVG (using the very same binary and thus process). Is > this something we should be expecting, and if so, why is this the case ?
That's not many bytes difference. Have you compared the PNGs in a hex editor? It could be that one of the metadata fields has some system- specific information in it. -- J. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
