I have noticed exosip is very picky about proper forming of uri names, but otherwise I have had no problems with it at all, and have a regular running server answering my voip line that has been up for over a month now. What version of osip and exosip are you using? I tested with 2.2.0 and 0.9.0.
Alexandre BOULANGER wrote: >Hi, > >That's fine, I'd like to try it out when it will be completed. > >In fact I've never managed to use a >0.8 version of Bayonne2 with SIP >support. It seems like SIP register segfaults the server, that was the >conclusion of my tests. I'll try to send you a report on this before the >end of this week. > > >Le mercredi 09 novembre 2005 à 16:14 -0500, David Sugar a écrit : > > >>I am currently building an iso image set for prepackaged builds of >>Bayonne and supporting libraries. This is mostly to initially hold >>tarballs and prebuilt RPM packages for centos4 (or RHEL4), and I am >>trying to keep the image under 50 megs so it can fit the business-card >>cd profile. Mostly I wanted to build this iso for something I can then >>give out at future events. >> >>I currently have the core libraries packaged and I have updated some of >>the rpm spec files in cvs as a result. I can probably have a completed >>iso for download early next week if anyone would wish to try it out. >> >> >> > > >
begin:vcard fn:David Sugar n:Sugar;David org:GNU Telephony email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;work:+1 201 215 2609 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.gnutelephony.org version:2.1 end:vcard
_______________________________________________ Bayonne-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bayonne-devel
