On February 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Hmmm, that's what testing is for. Certainly. However, it helps if you specify the error rather than just saying that there is one. BBDB is not an easy thing to test. Both the errors should be fixed in current CVS (note: the tarball doesn't get generated until midnight PST) and were caused by a faulty code rewrite, clearly illustrating why I'm not inclined to rip out large chunks of BBDB and replace it with more readable code :) Cheers, Waider. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me. I really need to reinstate the witty comments, dammit. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
- another day, another BBDB version, another backtr... Patrick Campbell-Preston
- Re: another day, another BBDB version, anoth... Ronan Waide
- Re: another day, another BBDB version, anoth... Patrick Campbell-Preston
- Re: another day, another BBDB version, anoth... Ronan Waide
- Re: another day, another BBDB version, anoth... Ronan Waide
- Re: another day, another BBDB version, anoth... Patrick Campbell-Preston
- Re: another day, another BBDB version, anoth... Patrick Campbell-Preston
- Re: another day, another BBDB version, anoth... Ronan Waide
- Re: another day, another BBDB version, anoth... Ronan Waide
- Re: another day, another BBDB version, anoth... Patrick Campbell-Preston
- Re: another day, another BBDB version, anoth... Patrick Campbell-Preston
- Re: another day, another BBDB version, a... Ronan Waide