> This is a very cool function, but you seem to be in the middle of > editing it.
Well now that you've corrected it :-) I did crank that out in less than an hour several weeks ago and since it worked I didn't notice > In `interactive', you ask for a record, but you then get the new notes > from `bbdb-current-record'. that. Since I always use it in the *BBDB* buffer, it worked. I'm not sure why I did the bbdb-get-record in the interactive instead of just using bbdb-current-record, though ... oh yeah, I saw that in some other code I was looking at for an example and figured it was necessary. > 2. Instead of `(bbdb-current-record)', use `record'. I'm doing that too now, thanks. -- Dave Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
